With Zoning, Affordability is Still Not a Priority (But We Can Change That!)
August 27, 2023
Observations from an Atlanta Zoning Review Board Meeting, by Anton Gudiswitz
The other week I showed up at City Hall to attend Atlanta’s Zoning Review Board meeting. I was there to support zoning amendments introduced by Councilmember Jason Dozier that would eliminate minimum parking requirements and prohibit new drive-throughs and gas stations within a half-mile of the Beltline.
The Zoning Review Board (ZRB) is an advisory committee that meets monthly to make recommendations on all zoning issues before they are presented to the City Council. Most of the 8 board members have experience working in real estate or government and they are volunteers appointed by the council. Usually there are about 8-10 items on the agenda, mostly requests for rezoning or exceptions, but they also provide input on wide-reaching proposals like Dozier’s Beltline Overlay legislation. For each item, the board allows 10 minutes to speak in support, and another 10 minutes for against. In almost all cases, the only pro speaker is the applicant but when proposals are getting neighborhood pushback it’s not uncommon to see a handful of NIMBYs ("Not In My BackYard") show up to speak against.
For the first item on the agenda, the Atlanta Land Trust was proposing to rezone a vacant lot near the Beltline in West End from single family to allow 4 new homes (a duplex plus 2 accessory dwelling units) which would be sold at below market-rate and deed-restricted to enable permanent affordable homeownership. This proposal had already been recommended by the Neighborhood Planning Unit (NPU) and by the Department of City Planning. No one besides Amanda Rhein, the representative for the Atlanta Land Trust, spoke in support or against the rezoning (I would have liked to speak in support, but I didn’t realize this was on the agenda).
After a few minutes of deliberation, the board voted 4-2 to recommend denial for the zoning request, citing that the proposed units were “out of character with the surrounding homes” and that the alley access to the backyard accessory dwelling units would bother neighbors. This was an incredibly disappointing recommendation. Essentially they decided (with zero evidence) that the neighbors probably wouldn’t want to live next to a different style house, and that’s more important than allowing 4 households to own an affordable home in a gentrifying neighborhood.
Onto CM Dozier’s legislation, there were a handful of attendees including myself who testified in support of these measures. Ultimately the board voted to recommend the measures that would remove parking requirements and ban new gas stations within the Beltline Overlay 🎉! This is good policy that will allow mixed-use and commercial developments to be built with less parking, which will enable more affordable options for people who don’t need a car. However the board didn’t endorse the ban on new drive-thrus. One board member cited concerns over equity, since the ban would limit needed economic opportunities in the less-developed parts of the Beltline Overlay. While I don’t doubt her good intentions, I’m not convinced that car-oriented fast-food franchises that contribute little in taxes, endanger pedestrians, and pay low wages are a good solution for equitable neighborhood development.




